Lexus NX Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
340 Posts
Well, it looks like NX300h is probably heavier than Toyota Camry Hybrid...and TCH gets around 8.0-8.5 seconds 0-60. THEN you add weight and AWD system...9.3 is probably right on the money. (In addition, Lexus tends to be conservative with their numbers...even then though, i doubt that you will see 7-seconds for the NX300h.)

I think that the Hybrid will be luxury and you can see that in the UK option profile. It will cost more than a base NX200t, contrary to recent report that hybrid and turbo will be same.

Were you guys expecting in the 6-second range?

My guess is that fuel economy will be around 36 mpg (maybe 38 city and 35 hwy).
 

· Banned
Joined
·
157 Posts
0-62 is the same for FWD and AWD, 9.3 sec for a hybrid is expected, I hope the 200t will do it 6.5-7.5 range. F model AWD only, wonder if it will be the same here and how much more weight the AWD system will put on.
Other thing worth mentioning is that the F doesn't show as having paddle shifters, did I miss it or will those paddle shifter only be for the turbo model?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
340 Posts
0-62 is the same for FWD and AWD, 9.3 sec for a hybrid is expected, I hope the 200t will do it 6.5-7.5 range. F model AWD only, wonder if it will be the same here and how much more weight the AWD system will put on.
Other thing worth mentioning is that the F doesn't show as having paddle shifters, did I miss it or will those paddle shifter only be for the turbo model?
Oh yeah forgot...NX300h AWD is really just tiny battery-powered electric motors on the rear axle to drive it. No driveshaft. So, yeah, it would make sense that acceleration be the same since weight is not an issue nor parasitic loss.

Now, the AWD on NX200t should have more parasitic loss from AWD system and weight.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top